Industrial meat production plays role in creation of new diseases

Published in The Catholic Register, May 21, 2020)

By Glen Argan

In Alberta, the province where I live, those hardest hit by the covid-19 pandemic are workers in meat processing plants. At High River’s Cargill plant, Canada’s largest meat-processing facility, 936 cases of covid-19 had been reported as of May 4 with hundreds more among people in the community who are associated with Cargill workers. At the JBS plant in Brooks, 300 workers had tested positive by the end of April with a total of 1,050 cases in the community by May 10. A city of 15,000 is in crisis because of the spread of the disease from the plant.

The problem is not limited to Alberta. A major outbreak also occurred at the Cargill plant in Chambly, Quebec, as well as in meat processing plants in the United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, Spain, Australia and Brazil. The apparent cause is well known – unsafe working conditions, workers being jammed together at a time when physical distancing is essential to prevent the spread of the disease.

CowsAnother side of this tragedy has been less examined – the role of industrial meat production in destroying animal habitat, a massive global problem which may have led to the creation of the covid-19 virus. In numerous places around the world, increasing demand for meat has led to deforestation which has further led to more wild animals being packed into smaller areas with poor habitat. Studies have shown that this cramming together of animals of different species in closer proximity to human communities has impelled the rise of new and unpredictable diseases of which covid-19 is the most virulent. So far.

In the Amazon region, 80 per cent of the deforestation has been to increase cattle production. This has led to an increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and to an existential threat to many indigenous communities. It has also destroyed massive amounts of wildlife habitat. The environmental science website, Mongabay.com, predicts that the next pandemic could emerge in the Amazon region.

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro not only sees no problem with deforestation, he encourages it such as by legalizing what had previously been illegal land theft in protected forest and indigenous reserves. Last year, the first year of Bolsonaro’s term as president, Amazon deforestation increased 74 per cent.

Massive profits can be made by supplying meat to a hungry world. Except that it is not the hungry people who are buying meat. The highest national per capita rate of meat consumption is in the United States where people consume 120.2 kilograms of meat per capita (2009 figure). Canada ranked 14th with per capita meat consumption at 94.3 kilograms per year.

In both countries, meat consumption is in decline as people switch to other forms of protein for health and environmental reasons. In China, however, per capita meat consumption increased from 52.4 to 58.2 kilograms per year from 2002 to 2009. One might think that this increase is due to increased prosperity. However, India too is becoming a wealthier country, but its people consume a mere 4.4 kilograms of meat per year, the second lowest rate in the world.

Perhaps of greater interest are the sharp consumption declines in Denmark and New Zealand. In a mere seven years, Denmark, once the world’s most meat-hungry nation, cut its per capita consumption from 145.9 to 95.2 kilograms. The reason? A sharp increase in public awareness of the ill effects of meat consumption. The country has launched a Quit Meat helpline and is considering a special sales tax on meat.

Awareness is growing in Canada too. The 2019 Canada Food Guide urges Canadians to try plant-based proteins such as lentils, beans, nuts, eggs, fish, tofu or chickpeas and to avoid saturated fats. Its website (food-guide.canada.ca) highlights a photo of a plate of healthy food. Only one-quarter of the plate has protein foods with emphasis given to plant-based proteins. The food guide promotes greater consumption of fruits and vegetables.

Meat is not evil. But we should be aware of the effects of our diet. Our planet cannot sustain the current rate of meat consumption. Industrial meat production is based on demand. That demand threatens workers in processing plants, destroys wildlife habitat, increases obesity, contributes to climate change and threatens to create new pandemics.

The covid-19 pandemic is being blamed on China’s wet markets, but the problem goes deeper and wider. We need a better-balanced diet to ensure the world has a healthier future.

(Glen Argan is a long-time contributor to Canada’s Catholic press.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s